Uncategorized

  • Week 3: The Heretic Queen

    A friend recommended two Michelle Moran books to me awhile back. She didn't say much about them, just said that she enjoyed them: Nefertiti and Cleopatra's Daughter. When I read them, I had this strange feeling that the stories were familiar to me, and that perhaps I had read them before and just forgotten (this happens to me frequently). However, I had just read Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra, so I thought that might explain the connection with Cleopatra's Daughter.

    Since then, I've read two more novels by Moran, Madame Tussaud (which I've seen being sold at Costco) and The Heretic Queen. All four books are historical fiction, with a teen romance bent. I like this sort of light historical fiction a lot because the story reads like a fun, fictional novel, but you also learn something about the world at that time.

    The Heretic Queen turned out to be a sort of sequel to Nefertiti. Not in a strict sense, since the characters were different. But they're set in the same time period and the two stories are related in that the main character in The Heretic Queen is the niece of Nefertiti, and the daughter of Mutny (who I considered to be the  main character in Nefertiti). The story stood up on its own, but it did make me want to reread Nefertiti. Not enough to request it from the library again, but enough that I had a vague longing that I owned the book so that I could skim it again without much effort.

    I like that Moran portrays these strong women, and really just sprinkles in the love story. You don't feel like it's fabricated, and it really helps you to identify with the characters and think that really we're not all that different even though thousands of years may separate us.

  • Week 2: The Vampire Diaries

    :: !! :: CAUTION :: CUIDADO :: ATTENTION :: !! ::

    There will probably be spoilers for both the TV series and the books in this post. I will not bother to post a flashing SPOILER ALERT sign before each instance. Proceed with caution if you care about such things.

    :: !! :: CAUTION :: CUIDADO :: ATTENTION :: !! ::

    So my sister started watching the TV series "The Vampire Diaries" over the holidays, and she roped me into watching it with her. We finished the first season and started in on the second, but then it started getting really intense to the point where so many different branches were developing that I was getting confused, and instead of drawing me into the show more it just made my brain shut off. So after that we stopped watching. But I was intrigued enough by the story, and its similarities to "Twilight" that I looked into it, and found out that the TV series is based on a series of books by L.J. Smith.

    There are actually three different series of "The Vampire Diaries" books. The first, and main, series was written by L.J. Smith herself and consists of The Awakening, The Struggle, The Fury, and Dark Reunion. These are the books that I got from the library, and also the ones I was most interested in reading. The books came out in 1991 (well before the "Twilight" series, which started in 2005).
    Later, she wrote another trilogy, "The Return" (which I just found out has Damon as the main character, so I may want to read those depending on how true to character the book-Damon is with the TV-Damon).
    After that, she co-wrote (or ghost-wrote?) "The Hunters," another trilogy. This one I'm least interested in reading, as it stinks of a ploy to extend a finished series simply for profit (*cough*HP7.2*cough*).

    To be honest, even though the TV series originally reminded me of "Twilight," by the time we had gotten a few episodes in, it was apparent that the two stories are very different. Firstly, they have completely different types of vampires. "Twilight" has the "sparkly vampires" whereas the vampires in "The Vampire Diaries" (VD) are more traditional: they can't go out in the sun, they die when a wooden stake pierces their heart, shape shifting (but not bats), etc. (No garlic, but there is this thing with vervain...) I don't really recall the original original way to make a new vampire, but in VD you simply need to die while having vampire blood in you. Nothing sketchy related to venom that alters your DNA/chromosomes. -.-;
    Although, now I think of it, both series give the vampires supernatural powers (think X-Men) on top of superhuman powers (speed, strength, etc.).

    So I tend to believe that some spoilers are okay (minor things) and some spoilers are really horrible, including hinting at things that might occur. I'm going to try to hold back without being too cryptic, but be warned, the following section will have the most spoilers for both "Twilight" and VD...

    So, after reading the four books in the original VD series, and watching the first season of VD, here are the main differences:
    - The book is set in Fell's Church, the TV series in Mystic Falls. (Why bother changing this detail?)
    - Elena is supposed to be blonde. Very blonde. With blue eyes. And she doesn't have a brother. And she wasn't adopted.
    - There is no offered explanation to why Elena and Katherine look alike (except Katherine briefly says "she must be a distant relation").
    - There is no emphasis on the "founding families" in the book. And the vampires (Salvatore or otherwise) did not live in the town previously.
    - Caroline is complete different in the book, more of an enemy. Elena's main friends are Bonnie (descended from druids, ie witch) and Meredith (more story with her that is barely used in the TV series).
    - Alaric's back story is completely altered for the TV series, including the story of his wife and why he comes to town at all.

    And here is my rant:
    Why is it that in these teen-fiction vampire novels girls fall instantly in love with the vampires? Even if they are supernaturally good looking, and you feel an instant attraction, you don't fall head over heels in love that quickly. In VD Elena and Stefan start dating a few weeks into the new school year, and then they get engaged near the end of book 2 (winter of that same year), and she becomes a vampire accidentally at the end of the same book. In "Twilight," Bella and Edward meet on the first day of school when she moves into town and they quickly become a couple. They're engaged sometime later that school year, then at the beginning of book 4 they get married, and midway through she turns into a vampire.
    Even if you do fall madly in love, do you really get engaged after three months of dating? Or even one year of dating? These are high school students! I mean, I know it happens in real life sometimes, and maybe more than I know, but really? I actually don't find it particularly romantic to rush into marriage.

    So the two books I got from the library were The Awakening and The Struggle in one volume, and then The Fury and Dark Reunion in the second volume. I read through the entire volume as one book so I think of it more as two "books." I won't say much about the second half of the series because it was quite unexpected, and deviated from the TV series more. But, my final opinion is this:

    I like science fiction and fantasy, and it often requires you to suspend disbelief. I can do that as long as some things still make sense. In VD, the world is our world, so I expect everything to be consistent with our world, and then on top of that I sprinkle in supernatural beings who may have supernatural powers. I can add vampires, werewolves, ghosts, witches, etc. willy-nilly and be completely satisfied with the setting of the book. But I think in the last book, Smith went a little too far, and it broke the spell for me. I enjoyed the books, I thought they were fun and they had an urgency about them when you read them. They are very fast-paced in that sense.
    At the end of the third book, I was satisfied. And I knew that the first three books in the series were centered around Elena and Stefan, but that the fourth was from the point of view of Bonnie, so I was expecting something different with the last book. But to be honest, I was disappointed with how the ending was handled. The last line was amusing and clever, and true to Bonnie. But the last bit of story just before that, like I said, it broke the spell and it had me coming away with a "meh" feeling.

    Would I recommend it? If you're a girl between the ages of 12 and 24, and you liked the "Twilight" series, then yeah, I'd recommend it. If you watched and liked the TV series, and you're curious, I'd say go for it. It's similar enough that you get a little fix, but it's different enough that it's not boring.
    If you're like me and you liked Damon in the TV series, these first four books won't do much for you. There isn't much insight into his character, and in fact they played up his role in the TV series.

    Got these other books from the library at the same time, so they'll be next on my list:
    Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen (I've heard good things)
    The Heretic Queen by Michelle Moran (I like Moran, and have been waiting for my turn with this book)
    Tell-All by Chuck Palahniuk (author recommended to me by a friend)

  • Week 1: GEB / War & Peace

    So... I might have made a resolution to read one book a week in 2012. And I know that if I pushed, I could probably get through one in the next three days. But I don't really feel like pushing, and I also don't want to "break" a resolution in the first week of the new year. So I think I'm going to wedge in the phrase "on average" in that line. Yeah, that's my plan.

    So currently, I'm working on two (or three) books, that have sort of bled over from 2011. One of them is a collection of W.S. Gilbert's operas, which I don't consider so much a "book" since it's more like an anthology, but I've also not recorded the individual operas as I've read them, so I'm considering the entire volume as one unit. (Run-on sentence, anyone?) That aside, I'm working on two books: "GEB" and War and Peace. Both are a bit heavy (literally and non-literally).

    I checked out the new translation of War and Peace from the library, but wasn't able to finish it before it was due. When I tried to renew it online, it said that someone else had already put the book on hold so I was obligated to return it. A quick search on Amazon found a free Kindle version of the book, so I downloaded that, and I'm chipping away at it on Mom's iPad. I'm currently 32% of the way through, and it's getting more interesting, so that's good. But the footnotes are no longer actually at the bottom of the page, so that's not so good.

    "GEB" is Douglas R. Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. It's a relatively famous book, winner of the Pulitzer Prize. Mike lent it to me, and I've been making my way through it. I was working on the MU puzzle, when I realized I've encountered that particular puzzle before. Although last time I just read straight on through without trying the puzzle. This time I tried it (but couldn't solve it). So that was fun-ish. So far GEB is much much much better written than the other math-y book I read last year (Pi in the Sky, rec'd by Brad).

    And while on the subject of books I read last year, I thought I'd just copy and paste my "results" from 2011:

    2011 Final Count: 121 (22 Non-Fiction)

    Recommended
  • Turn Coat ~ Jim Butcher
  • A Town Like Alice ~ Nevil Shute
  • The Mists of Avalon ~ Marion Zimmer Bradley
  • A World Without Ice ~ Henry Pollack
  • The Color Purple Alice Walker
  • Highly Rated / Memorable

  • Cleopatra's Daughter ~ Michelle Moran
  • The Postman ~ David Brin
  • The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks ~ Rebecca Skloot
  • Feed ~ M.T. Anderson
  • The Soul of a New Machine ~ Tracy Kidder
  • Geisha: A Life ~ Mineko Iwasaki
  • The Girl Who Played with Fire ~ Stieg Larsson
  • The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest ~ Stieg Larsson
  • Watership Down ~ Richard Adams
  • The Perks of Being a Wallflower ~ Stephen Chbosky
  • The Martian Chronicles ~ Ray Bradbury
  • 2011 in 12 Sentences

    -- a summary of the year taken from journals 47 & 48

    04 Jan :: Whatever happened to 750Words?

    05 Feb :: Mike surprised me with a visit and proposed with the Tiffany's ring we saw in San Francisco.

    07 Mar :: Finger cracked and split while polishing today.

    02 Apr :: I just want to finish this so I can submit it and graduate.

    04 May :: Mom's bag got sent to Amman.

    07 Jun :: Amara Rachel Hean / born 6/6/11, 11:09p / 7lbs. 4oz. / 19.3 in

    07 Jul :: Mom called 公 at his new place to tell him I'm getting married next year.

    25 Aug :: Addicted to Facebook's Zynga-Cityville game.

    04 Sep :: And super fat cheeks, and no elbows to speak of.

    08 Oct :: I think Bowen got engaged.

    07 Nov :: Allen looked as usual, but quite dapper in his suit.

    22 Dec :: Got my Costco membership with May today.

  • Seven (December 2011)

    Jan 2010
    Dec 2010

    Seven Things You're Scared Of:
    (1) things that might be in the dark (2) being in the dating world (3) nosebleeds (4) public speaking (5) other people cutting my nails (6) major injuries (7) cars

    Seven Things That Make You Laugh:
    (1) May (2) cats (3) jokes (4) Daddy (5) inside jokes (6) people counting beans (7) Monty

    Seven Things You Hate:
    (1) nosebleeds (2) when my toes or fingers swell up in the cold (3) hives (4) okra (5) the smell in the dog area on the last day before the next cleaning (6) people pointing out temporary physical flaws on your face (7) big ants that crunch when you kill them

    Seven Things You Don't Understand:
    (1) string theory (2) Big Bang Theory (3) religion (4) Euchre (5) Youxue (6) my own personality (7) the stock market

    Seven Places You'd Rather Be:
    (1) Caribbean (2) somewhere warmer (3) Rockford (4) in the future (5) California (6) somewhere with snow (7) somewhere near the ocean

    Seven Things On Your Desk:
    (1) laptop (2) bamboo pencil holder (3) Sun-Ripened Raspberry lotion (4) Nervous System box (5) nail clipper (6) Luchador key (7) sticker book

    Seven Things/People That Intrigue You:
    (1) Leyan (2) May (3) Monty (4) cats (5) Mike (6) chemistry (7) design

    Seven Things You Are Right Now:
    (1) wearing a turtleneck (2) about to embark on a shopping adventure (3) hungry (4) planning to put away Christmas decorations (5) talking to my sister (6) being talked to by my dad (7) gazing out my window

    Seven Things You Want To Be:
    (1) older (2) married (3) happy (4) comfortable (5) healthy (6) not sore (7) eating a delicious biscuit with bacon butter and seasonal jam

    Seven Things You Don't Want To Be:
    (1) cold (2) poor (3) fat (4) in a car crash (5) arthritic or rhematic (6) drowning (7) allergic to cats

  • Resolutions for 2012

    1. Finish entire P90X Yoga routine.
    2. Read at least one book a week.
    3. Memorize -kana.
    4. Get through May's French textbook.
    5. Fill out "TIL..." cards.

  • Wednesday Envelopes

    I think most of us grow up in a relatively small circle of acquaintances. In my elementary school, there were two or three classes of 30 kids each in my grade. I might've known some kids from the grade above me, and maybe the kids in my sister's year, but mostly we just hung out with the kids in our own class. I think this is normal for most people.
    We didn't go from grade to grade with the exact same class, so I probably shared at least one year with every person in my grade, but I wouldn't say I knew them all well. If I try to list one person from each year off the top of my head, I get:

    K- Sarah Chamberlain
    1- Bobby Malone
    2- Diana Lee
    3- Regina Nieu
    4- Akemi Okamura
    5- Derek Koning
    6- Bowen Li

    As an aside, in that list of people, I'm still friends with 3. I was only friends for a few years with 2. And I barely knew 2.

    Anyway, that was life for 7 years.
    In middle school, there were several feeder elementaries, and I met a few new people, but most of us stuck with our old friends. And in high school that was even more true since there were less feeder middle schools that went to our high school.
    Although, surprisingly, I think in high school I knew more of the people in the other grades. Then again, maybe that shouldn't be as surprising since we're older and some classes (electives) mix grades (ie. art, choir, intro. to business, etc.). Or maybe it should be, since it's more cliquey. Or maybe it shouldn't be since cliques are usually formed around things other than class years (ie. cheerleaders, band dorks, LSD, etc.).

    I've lost my train of thought.

    Oh right.

    In such a small community, you start thinking (and rightly so), that everyone grows up with the same basic experiences as you. Especially in the suburbs, there really isn't that much different between different families. Maybe someone's Chinese and someone else is Jewish. Maybe someone has divorced parents, or one parent has died. But pretty much we're all neighbors, and the neighborhood I grew up in was pretty bland. Not that it's a bad thing. Necessarily.

    I remember freshman year I was in Spanish 2 in la Srta. Templer's class. She had this system where she paired up the kids with the best grades and the kids with the worst grades. I met these two people, Wilson and Joey. (Later I found out Joey was Katrina-ayi's son.) They were friends and seniors, I think. Anyway, afterward Joey joined the army or something, and served in Iraq. And I remember thinking how strange it was that I would know someone who joined the army. In my life, that only happened on TV. Everyone I knew went on to be EECS geeks at Berkeley or some such.

    I remember my senior year I found out some Korean boys would hang out behind the school smoking cigarettes. And I thought, how stupid, who would willingly choose to smoke cigarettes given the DARE unit we had every year since we were able to sit still long enough for the teachers to give us a presentation about how bad smoking was for your health? But I didn't know those Korean boys, so I shrugged it off.
    What really shocked me was when I found out Jims had been smoking. I still can't wrap my head around that, but whatever.

    I've always had an irrational belief that everyone else is like me, thinks like me, had the same learning experiences as me, knows what I know. And I know that it can't possibly be true, but it actually worked out surprisingly well when I was a kid. All my friends were like me in the Most Important Ways. Maybe I was not as talented in some ways, and more talented in others. But I think we had the same core values. We listened to our parents, we didn't torment our siblings too much, we didn't smoke or drink, we didn't have sex. We did our homework, we tried our best in our classes, we were honest and respectful most of the time. We tried to support each other, we discouraged each other from doing stupid things, we talked things out, we gave and sought advice. I don't know. We had boring lives. Safe lives.

    When I was at Michigan, explaining for the fifth time how to solve 5x=3x+2 to college sophomores, it really made me feel...confused. I've been around people who didn't do as well in math as I did. But I always believed it was because they didn't care, or didn't bother to do their homework. (And in high school that was probably mostly true.) In college, I was the one who struggled, but I slogged through it and I came out of it okay, if not at the top (or anywhere near, lol) of my class. But that was (and I'm not trying to brag) higher math.
    When someone tells me that the first step to solve 5x=3x+2 is to subtract 5, and by doing that you get x=3x-3, I really have no idea where to start. Didn't everyone get the same math background that I did? Did they learn addition and subtraction in first grade? Did they learn multiplication in second grade? Did they learn how to do long division? Did they take algebra in middle school? In high school? At all??

    I was reading a book by Obama recently, The Audacity of Hope. He says a lot of things that have been said before, and one of those things was that no matter how much the government stepped in to try to improve education in America, a lot still depended on the parents. You have to try to instill in your children the importance of education, if not a love for learning itself.

    When I look back at my childhood, I can't remember a time when I didn't think it was important to try hard in school. I also can't remember a time when my parents told me, "You need to try hard in school because education is important." I'm sure they did, but I don't remember them having to explicitly say it because I think I always knew it.
    Now how did that happen?

    I was thinking, community probably has a huge effect as well. I can't think of anyone who failed any year in my elementary school. Even Stanley Ames was promoted every year (until both he and his brother, Michael, disappeared one year... moved away, I think). And I can't think of anyone who should have failed any year.
    Mr. Haas told me that he used to teach at another high school where students would come into high school and take algebra as a freshman, fail it, and retake it again sophomore and junior years, failing it each time. Then senior year, they'd be in the class for the fourth year, and still be struggling.
    In our school district, a huge chunk of kids took algebra in middle school. By the time they were seniors they were either in calculus, or they had already finished calculus and were taking AP Stats. Even the kids who struggled with math were able to get through algebra 2, geometry, and trigonometry before they graduated.

    And I know that my school district is a bit out of the ordinary. Or even more than a bit.
    But I think my point is that my parents always cared how I was doing. And that's true for all of the kids I was friends with, and most of the kids I knew.

    I remember in elementary school, as early as third grade and possibly earlier, we used to have "Wednesday Envelopes." Every week, all of our graded work from the previous week was put into these manila envelopes, along with school and class announcements, permission slips, PTA newsletters, whatever. On the front of the envelope was pasted a sheet with your name and a lot of lines with the date of each Wednesday. Every Wednesday you had to take this envelope home and give it to your parents, and your parents had to sign it so that you could return the envelope on Thursday. And you got points for doing this.

    I never thought about this before, because we did it every Wednesday for as long as I can remember all the way through 6th grade. In fifth and sixth grade we even got extra points or something for helping the teacher to file papers into the correct envelopes. There was a classroom job for filing and one for stuffing envelopes. (I loved those. ^^; Way better than cleaning the whiteboards or taking out the trash anyway.)

    Tangent: You know, I'm really starting to see a pattern in the jobs I enjoy. Rote, mindless tasks with definite short-term goals. And organizational or streamlining tasks.

    Pretty much everyone in my class brought back their signed envelopes on Thursday. Every Thursday. Every year. Maybe once or twice someone forgot. But then they probably forgot the entire envelope and brought it back signed on Friday. And I've never heard of anyone forging their parent's signature on their Wednesday Envelope. (Who would? We were elementary school kids, for crying out loud. Then again, I wouldn't put it past the kids these days either. =X)
    I think, I always assumed that everyone in every school did this. It was such a normal thing that we did, that nobody thought twice about. It just was. And it, in a way, forced parents to care. If they didn't go through their kids' work, at least they had to do something every week that was related to their kid's school. And maybe at least once a year they would have time, or be so bored as to go through one of the envelopes and see what their kid was up to.

    But now that I think about it. It's entirely possible that John Muir was the only school to have Wednesday Envelopes.

    I wonder...

  • MWhite: cards are like catnip to grandmothers

  • Take.It.To.the.Limit~The.Eagles

    ...
    you can spend all your time making money
    you can spend all your love making time
    if it all fell to pieces tomorrow
    ...
    and when you’re looking for your freedom
    and you can’t find the door
    when there’s nothing to believe in
    ...

  • missing...

    missing is like the ache of new soreness. like the fatigue of muscles a few hours after a good workout; long enough that the adrenaline has faded, but not so long as to allow the sharp tightness that comes the following day - more tired than sore, but with a tinge of pain. yet a good pain.
    missing is like the feeling of despair, but lighter and more subtle. it has that shadowy depth to it that depression more than sadness can have. a slight feeling of hopelessness or helplessness. but all that is blanketed by a soft layer of fluff so that it seems a bit hidden, a bit out-of-sight-out-of-mind. and yet still present and self-aware.
    missing is a dampness, a cloud, a fog. it permeates the world but it doesn't inhibit except in extreme cases. it's sort of humid, but not quite wet. it feels heavy and slightly suffocating, but so light as to make you wonder if it's all in your mind, as it actually is.
    missing is the navy blue/black of midnight with a semi-transparent layer of gray to take the edge off the intensity and lend a mystical/mistical unknown to the purity of the hue.

    16oct2011

  • Categories